|
|
|
EnvironmentIntroductionThe attractive setting of the village gives rise to numerous opportunities to enjoy both local environments and those close at hand. The questions in the survey related to three main factors, the quality and accessibility of the open spaces, the quality and accessibility of the PROW, and other factors that could be summarised as ‘nuisances’ The rural landscape provides some accessible green space such as Hillhouse Woods and many public rights of way (PROW), including long distance paths such as the Essex Way. Also within the village envelope are the large playing fields by the Orpen Hall and the open space at Poor’s Field, as well as the Village Green (The Heath), pockets of smaller green space generally within housing areas (amenity greens), the Churchyards, allotments (which do not have open access) and three ponds. The village does not have a formal public park or garden as such within its boundaries. There are some older properties that have significant trees or hedgerows that contribute to the rural character and biodiversity value of parts of the village. Many newer developments do not. A few trees are protected with Tree Preservation Orders. Hedgerows within villages are generally not protected. Survey QuestionsThe main surveys that related to the environment were those for the household and those for clubs and organisations. Main findings from the surveysOpen SpacesAn overwhelming percentage of respondents (87%) felt that the open spaces in and around West Bergholt were very important to them with nobody thinking that they weren’t important at all. 90% thought it was an important factor in their decision to move to the village and 80% used these spaces frequently or fairly frequently Organisations felt that access to open space was good in the village although dog fouling, litter and glass were issues requiring attention. Public Rights of Way and FootpathsThe value of the footpath network is generally significant to large numbers of the village community with 95% rating them as quite or very important. Nearly 75% use them frequently or fairly frequently. Only 11% however felt the network was very well-maintained. This is an issue which clearly requires further discussion to establish peoples’ expectations. Other major environmental issuesOf the seven categories of ‘nuisance’ people were most concerned about litter and dog-fouling, 58% and 54% thinking these were significant issues to be addressed. Villagers were also concerned about traffic noise (37%), light pollution (22%) or noisy environments (25%). When it came to commenting in detail about environmental issues traffic speed and parking matters featured strongly, as did antisocial behaviour and maintenance of hedges and footpaths. Village organisations raised concerns about the lack of bridleways, the presence of litter and broken glass, dog fouling and poor levels of street lighting. Issues emerging from the surveysa. Household Survey
b. Survey of Clubs and Organisations
Establishing PrioritiesThe top areas to take forward from this area of the plan were established through the survey of priorities held in spring 2008
Action Plan
|
|
Send mail to
webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.
|